InsaneJournal

Having watched yet *another* cult classic...
At the behest of a friend (thanks, Tav!), I have watched 'Boondock Saints.' Mostly because of a certain actor who happens to be my favourite of mine at the moment. (i.e., Willem Dafoe) *creepy fangirl*

Anyway, judging from the preponderance of twincest fic on FF.net, I have, yet *again* ended up enjoying a movie from a *completely* different perspective from most of the other people who watched it.

Translation: Dafoe in drag equals happy Mel. For whatever reason. X3 I don't know why, it was just HOT. *is shot*

I can die a happy Mel. X3

Anyway, completely apart from my fantardedness, something about the movie deeply disturbed me. I'm not entirely sure why, but I think it might be because at the end, the man who was shot was unarmed. Yes, yes, a bizarre reason at best - but it's the only thing I can pinpoint. That, and the ambiguity I feel - is vigilantism right? Is it necessary, in this day and age, when murderers and rapists are often not punished as severely as they should be?

That I have no answers to the questions this movie raises might be the reason that it bothers me so much. It will take thought.